

| Ten Ways to Write the Equation of a Line |
|
|
|
| Monday, 27 October 2008 04:29 | ||||
|
Slope-intercept form is taught in nearly every classroom in the United States, yet there are some countries that never teach it at all. (One exchange student at our school was only familiar with method #9 below.) There just may be something off this list you’ve never seen before.1. Slope-intercept form
The slope is the change in y divided by the change in x, often known by students as “rise of run.” There is a direct geometric interpretation, so it is easy to transfer from graph to equation and back again. Extensive use of this form also allows an intimate understanding of slope, which translates directly into the difference quotient from calculus. However, the equation is restricted to 2-space (the plane), and doesn’t include every possible line (vertical lines) like: 2. Intercept form
This form has the advantage that it is directly related to the usual form of conic sections (parabolas, circles, ellipses, and hyperbolas). For instance, substituting x² and y² for x and y gives the formula for an ellipse. 3. Point-slope form![]()
This is useful if a problem gives you a slope and a point on the line but not the intercept. The “alternate” form matches the function notation, and also can be typed directly into a graphing calculator. 4. Two point formGiven two points on the line, (x1,y1) and (x2,y2): ![]() This is just point-slope form with the formula for slope substituted in. It has the advantage of expressing in only one equation for a process that normally takes two (find the slope, then plug into point-slope form). 5. Function form
6. Standard form and general form
Where the slope is -a/b, the intercept is c/a, and the y-intercept is c/b.
Where the slope is –a/b, the intercept is –c/a, and the y-intercept is –c/b. This form is a linear combination, linking it directly with linear algebra. It’s also the usual form for when solving lines as a system of equations. While the direct geometric intuition is removed, but it is at least still possible to derive the slope and intercepts from the formulas given above. It also isn’t hard to extend the formula into 3-space:
7. Modified standard form
![]() Here the slope is –a/b. Commentary: This form has the same advantage standard form does with as easy extension into 3-space yet it also includes a piece of geometric information about the line directly in the equation. 8. Parametric![]() or
Where v is the velocity of an object, q its angle, and x0 and y0 the point the line is at when t = 0 (that is, the starting time). While this form can be used to describe lines in general (by letting t be any real number) it’s often used to describe the motion of an object moving in a straight line, since t can be used to note its location at any given time. 9. Vector
x0 and y0 are the starting point of the line. a indicates the x portion of the direction vector (equivalent to the “run”) and b the y portion (equivalent to the “rise”). t is any real number, so the formula generates a line infinite in both directions. Commentary: This is equivalent to the parametric form, that is the two formulas:
An additional advantage of this form is the easy generalization into other dimensions, for example 3 space: This form can also be turned back into an equation by solving for t, then substituting: ![]() It even works in 3-space: ![]() 10. Matrix determinant form![]()
ConclusionIt’s easy after enough teaching the same curriculum for a long time to get locked into a particular orthodoxy, and forget that there are many approaches to any topic in mathematics. Just like learning new languages, learning new forms can increase our flexibility of thought and put into place concepts that were previously obscured.
Jason
Dyer holds degrees in Fine Arts Studies and Math and teaches at Pueblo High
School in Arizona. His school mascot is the Warriors and his other blog of
residence is The Number Warrior.POSTED ON HOTCHALK.COM
Comments (3)
![]()
...
written by Jason Dyer, November 11, 2008
#9 is the only method taught in some places in Europe. It does generalize into multiple dimensions quite easily and it isn't too hard to turn from parametric to standard form.
I'm not sure what the justification is for ignoring other forms entirely, though. report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
... written by Jackie Ballarini, November 09, 2008
Very interesting. Do you know which method is presented in other countries and why?
I've never really understood the importance we place on the slope-intercept method. report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment
|
||||






































Another is that you can go beyond {x,y,1} and think about hypersurfaces whose defining equations use more interesting monomials.
For example, any circle in the plane can be written as A(x^2 + y^2) + Bx + Cy + D = 0. So using {x^2+y^2,x,y,1} for our columns instead of {x,y,1}, we get a 4x4 determinant -- which means we need to input three points instead of two to determine the circle. (If they are collinear, A will be 0.)
For a general plane conic, use {x,y,xy,x^2,y^2,1}. This requires the specification of 5 points.