

| A Look at Obama's Education Plan |
|
|
|
| Wednesday, 14 January 2009 04:56 | ||||
|
Obama’s education plan gives early education high priority; a good deal of input came from James Heckman, a Nobel laureate economist famous for his studies of early childhood education.
-- From Barack Obama and Joe Biden’s Plan for Lifetime Success Through Education One heavily cited study in the literature is the Perry Preschool Program, done in the 1960s in Ypsilanti, Michigan. 65 children aged 3-4 with IQs measured as 80 or below were randomly selected to be part of a program involving the children 150 minutes a day in class and home visits for 90 minutes a day. A similar control group was not given the interventions. There was an initial boost in IQ scores with the experimental group, which eventually went away:
However, the long-term effects were eye-popping:
(Data source: Barnett, Benefit-cost analysis of preschool education: findings from a 25-year follow-up.) Another commonly-referenced study is the Carolina Abecedarian program (1972-1985), where, at age 15, the experimental group had 24% of their students in special education and the control group had 48% of their students in special education. Note that this does not imply a utility to universal preschooling, only to intervention preschooling. As Mr. Barnett puts it, “children whose home environments were very highly supportive of cognitive development and socialization actually had lower scores if they had been in care outside their homes” and that “children whose home environments were relatively poor gained the most from outside care.” The Obama plan mentions that while access would be “universal” it would also be “voluntary.”
Barnett calculates (in 1990 dollars) a cost of $12,356 for a gain to society of $108,002, giving a net of $95,646, so $7.74 for every dollar spent. Other estimates are similar. Note that not every economist agrees with the above analysis; most famously a section of Freakonomics claims the ineffectiveness of Head Start (one of the programs targeted for increased funding by the Obama plan). How does this affect mathematics? I’m going to switch to quoting from a joint position statement between National Association for Education of Young Children and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics:
Vertical integration efforts tend to focus entirely on the K-12 continuum, not treating pre-K as “real” teaching and with little discussion (in mathematics and elsewhere) of what the standards should be. While the disconnect between education research and practice is worry enough, at the pre-K level communication is almost nonexistent. If universal preschool becomes a reality, educators at the higher levels need to get serious about linking standards and doing outreach.
POSTED ON HOTCHALK.COM
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
||||









Jason Dyer holds degrees in Fine Arts Studies and Math and teaches at Pueblo High School in Arizona. His school mascot is the Warriors and his other blog of residence is 












